@DK-nq9wv
The law was referred to slaves not immigrations.
@NoOne-uu2zt
Read further it says more
@kennethmeeker6369
There around 1000 constitutional law experts in America specializing in text history and tradition with PHD’s they all have a different opinion.
@matthewreichlin4993
I'm not going to argue one way or another, but I'm just going to point out that I repeatedly hear people say it's very simple language, and then they leave out the part about subject to the jurisdiction, which makes it very unsimple language. Besides that, the simple language of shall not be infringed never seems to be so simple to the left.
@MA-ri5he
😂 Typical lefty
@Revelationtv21