@PatJSchreiber

Great video. Studying for the LSAT has been so intellectually enriching. I have been doing well in my studies without understanding traditional logic theory, but I had no idea how much seeing these graphic representations would help. Observing my metacognition as I learn new things and apply them while attempting to solve LSAT questions has been one of the stranger things I've experienced.

I used to just see letters and arrows materialize in my head along with the occasional Venn diagram. Now I can see these new visual representations after watching your videos. And even when I don't go through the process of visualizing the parts of a given stimulus, for some odd reason, I just happen to know with greater accuracy and confidence when something is confusing necessary for sufficient or when to stop second-guessing myself and just accept I already picked the right answer even if I can't necessarily put it into words why that is.

I'm taking another practice test tomorrow or Sunday. I'm excited to apply the new connections and visual imagery I have going on in my head at the moment, courtesy of your videos. My diagnostic was a 163. Three weeks later, it was a 169. It has been two weeks now, and I'm optimistic about scoring another improvement. Come August,  I'm going for a perfect score on the official exam, as pretentious as that sounds, but I just don't see why any question on the LSAT would be beyond my reach after I study three more months.

Your material has been invaluable to me, someone who has never taken a formal logic class, to have a fighting chance at reaching 180.

@RileighHanson

You are the only instructor that causes the, "ahh, I get it!" synapses to occur in my brain.

@safiasayedi4564

This was super easy to understand and made the concept make so much more sense than how it is taught traditionally

@jakeconant4186

If you live in NOLA, you live in Louisiana. If you don't live in Louisiana, you definitely don't live in NOLA. But not living in NOLA doesn't mean you don't live in Louisiana. You could live in Shreveport (failing the sufficient). 

Been studying for the LSAT for like 2 years and finally, FINALLY, these have become easy with this one video. Thank you so much!

@zenaidarojas5689

Thank you for this! I feel like you do well with explaining, and helping me connect the dots with understanding conditionals. It also helps me understand, why the contrapositive, of term "B" would not equal "A". Because B could equal a whole lot of other things, and COULD be A, but doesn't necessarily HAVE to be. Which allows me to connect my understanding of placement a little better.

@heewonpark8420

Thank you for the great explanations. Mastering multiple mental models is like wielding a Swiss army knife!

@glacierblue456

Thank you!! I feel like this just took my understanding of conditional statements to another level!

@Jonathan-b7t

If you watch this video closely and pay attention, then you will have a better understanding of conditionals.

@EddieStyle

Very helpful! Thank you!

@lolo2good

Thank you! -2024

@capturingthemomentmediallc6799

Great tips

@markbrad123

What people who study law have to realize is that people talk with varied context: - that maybe talking specifically, generally, sometimes,  adhoc, or restrictively  --  and  it can sound the same in English.  So  LSAT flawed argumentative behavior could be appeal to known context straw men  flaws in the real world.  Suppose it is up to lawyers to home in very clearly on what a client really means contextually.

@goatsontvwithaheart

Bravo!

@uraddiictOnx3

I can't wait for this to click omg

@ameenaah12

Very helpful, thank you!