@snappycattimesten
Plot twist: the presenter in this video is AI.
@736736736736
Too fast not enough time to examine both videos
@peterschmidt1453
If I did nor know there was a choice I would not have assumed many were faked.
@annieo.4779
This is scary. Except for the cat with 3 front paws and the lights off in the gallery, the rest were still hard to spot even after you pointed them out. Hard to believe anything anymore unless you are living it.
@whymustisignin4this
I don’t know if anyone else is experiencing this but since I’ve seen the sora ai videos I now question a lot of video, to the point that now a lot of video, even totally real stuff, looks a bit fake to me. We really need to label AI content. Otherwise we’ll end up trusting nothing.
@juiced311
A lot of the AI videos have a smoother movement to them. I only missed one.
@viazel2796
I Missed 4 and 5! But the animation was scary. I give them 2 years and we will be in trouble. This was great please do another with current technology involved. Thank you!
@MeriMorMick
I did poorly. Scary.
@isapluschke3643
This was a learning curve for me, thank you
@NDAsDontCoverIllegalActs
The eye version was the most obvious to me.
@AndyJP
I only got 1 wrong but what was interesting is that the AI mistakes you noticed were completely different than what I noticed
@JazzyJan15
Surprised I even got 4 right. Very hard to tell.
@Denise11Schultz
We need a whole new kind of discernment to be good citizens. It would help to pace the examples slower with a longer pause of not talking. I hope you do a regular series of these, it is going to be a very important skill. (I flunked.)
@user-eg8ht4im6x
Helpful, I got quite a few wrong ,just shows can’t always believe what you see.
@debatable98
I got all right, but i feel it’s important to note that we are judging this when we’re explicitly told one is AI and we have a definitive comparison. If I came across any of these in short form content, I probably would have assumed most were real. Which is terrifying.
@rohanofelvenpower5566
I got all of them right on the first try. Only the eye one I paused before you said and had a 2nd glance at. ALL the AI examples in this video had unnaturla colours. Just too crisp and good to be true. The one with the chinese new year dragon is a good example, super sharp and contrasting colour while looking like 16k super OLED bluray production. Cameras don't do that. The skin on the eye one looked too good to be true as well. I don't know if I'm capable of distinguishing these without a comparison side by side of a norml video though! SO yes the future is scray boys and girls !
@raspas99
Use words appropriately. Water doesn't look "really weird". It looks extremely close to how water would look. It looks more like water than animation could do. In actuality I think only frame rate is a bit slower. Really weird would be pink dots or something
@xzlwnk
0:30 "The water looks really weird." Dude, one of the people literally disappeared.
@jonnyOysters
The only reason why i caught the eye one. Was the video on the left has an eyebrow curling. To me that feels like an animation AI struggled with. And it looked incredibly realistic. The one on the right was just an eye blinking. Which I felt AI wouldn't have so much trouble animating
@Jennifermcintyre